🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned ruling, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to implement a revised congressional boundary scheme that could add up to five additional Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 decision, handed down on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to overturn a federal judge's injunction that had struck down the new map in November.

Justices' Explanation

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating much confusion and disrupting the fine federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in justifying its ruling.

That lower court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely sorted voters according to their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it adopted the new maps. It had mandated the state to use the boundaries created after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Stinging Opposition

With a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's ruling. She argued that it disregarded the work of the lower court, observing that its ruling was crafted by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling ensures that Texas's new map, with all its increased political tilt, will dictate next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a breach of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Fight

This decision is part of a countrywide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to reshape the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican control. Typically, boundary revision takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that could add several additional Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have responded with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State AG hailed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes supportive of Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

Conversely, opposition party officials lamented the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major party campaign committee.

A senior Democratic leader stated the court had another time shredded its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.